Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Olog-hai
Olog-hai: "...conjecture does not make for good science (or science at all) and by definition has to be excluded."

"Conjecture" so-called, is certainly a part of the scientific process -- it's the root source of first hypotheses and if confirmed, theories.
In other words: without early conjecture, you'll get no eventual hypotheses & theories.

Olog-hai: "It is only anti-science people that try to disguise conjecture as science."

That issue, of course, is not whether "conjecture" is ever legitimate, but whether it has been properly identified as such, and only used as appropriate -- i.e., in a summary of potential implications.

This thread's article is a media news report on scientific results, one written to interest general readers, not duplicate a scientific paper.

166 posted on 11/16/2014 7:02:43 PM PST by BroJoeK (a little historical perspective..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies ]


To: BroJoeK

Conjecture part of the scientific process? It can be, but only when on solid scientific ground first.

Popperist thinking has really hurt science due to his/its rejection of inductivism. Francis Bacon had the right approach.


169 posted on 11/16/2014 7:14:14 PM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson