Nobody with half a brain denies the fossil evidence of past ages of life. But Darwinism (the "Origin of the Species") requires TRANSFERENCE between major animal groups. There is NO evidence of that, and whatever paltry evidence is conjured up is vastly outweighed by the tonnage of evidence of Intelligent Design which Darwinists "hand-wave and deny" although "there's nothing fraudulent or fake about it."
Basically, you're just playing word-definition games -- what is a "transference", what is a "major animal group"?
The fact of the matter is that no individual animal ever magically gave birth to offspring of another "major animal group" -- but that is what you suggest evolution requires.
It does no such thing.
What happens instead is that separated populations of one species evolve separately until they can no longer interbreed; then we call them two species, not one.
Extended over tens and hundreds of millions of years, different species evolve, step by step, to new genera, families, orders, class, etc.
But no individual ever "transfers" into anything different.
PapaNew: "...whatever paltry evidence is conjured up is vastly outweighed by the tonnage of evidence of Intelligent Design which Darwinists "hand-wave and deny" although "there's nothing fraudulent or fake about it.' "
Of course, I believe the entire Universe is intelligently designed to produce exactly what we see today, including us.
We are not an accident, or even a probability, but we're here by design and for a purpose.
Science tells us that part of the methodology God used to get us here is called "evolution".
I sure don't have a problem with that, and don't really see why others like yourself do.