Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Swordmaker

#6 looks dicey.


46 posted on 11/11/2014 9:37:00 PM PST by HandyDandy (Don't make-up stuff. It just wastes everybody's time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: HandyDandy
#6 looks dicey.

Not when the orthodox cosmologists claim there are no charges in space. . . and that there should not be a flow of current. The very fact they have found such is a validation of #6. We shall have to see about the rest of the predictions in #6 and see how they will effect the landing. When Deep Impact approached Tempel 1, the Electric Universe cosmologists predicted a large discharge flash of lightning before the probe struck the comet because the two objects had far different electrical charges.

Such a bolt of electricity did indeed strike the probe, resulting in a "double flash," much to the "bafflement" of the orthodox scientists in charge of the mission, and blew out the probe's sensors microseconds before the impact. The same thing should be true of the differing charges Rosetta, its lander Philae, and 67P. The lander requires far more electronics to maneuver its landing than did the Deep Impact mission's impacter module needed to hit at 22,000 MPH. The exchange of electrons to balance the charges could blow out important electronics on the lander, crippling it, because the mission's scientists have not allowed for such an event, not believing in there being charge differentials in space. . . despite there being tons of evidence of charge flows in space literally everywhere we look.

48 posted on 11/11/2014 9:56:46 PM PST by Swordmaker (This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users continue...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson