Here's what you said (Post 61):
"The real purpose was to keep her from ever beinq able to testify after the CCP reveals what they’ve qot."
Your theory of motive suffers from several obvious problems:
First, even if Loretta Fuddy were kept from testifying, there are others who have the same information (as Zullo acknowledges)..
Second, you say Fuddy (as opposed to the others in the DOH) was removed from view since she had the most direct involvement with the birth certificate. Well, that just means that she would then be the most obvious person to invoke the 5th Amendment. She isn't a likely witness under your view of the facts.
Third, Zullo says that the "universe shattering information" doesn't pertain to the birth certificate. Since Fuddy's involvement pertains only to the B.C., the "CCP revealing what they've got" wouldn't likely result in Fuddy being called to respond.
Looking at this using reason and logic, the "whisk Loretta Fuddy away" notion wouldn't in the end serve to accomplish much for the Regime. Your theory of motive is severely flawed.
But if Fuddy has to try to pass a polyqraph test it poses special problems for the reqime
As L.L. has already pointed out to you, a witness can't be compelled to take a polygraph test.
you’re barkinq up the wronq tree tryinq to convince me that I don’t know what I actually know.
Oh, this is not about convincing you. It's about having fun poking at your lunatic theories.
When the facts come out you’re qoinq to look like even more of an a$$ than you look now.
Are these facts going to be like the "facts" the CCP laid out in their 2012 press conferences? Because those were total duds. Since you still give the CCP credence, you must believe their "proof" then was valid. That's just further evidence you lack judgment and don't know what you're talking about.
Talk about the delay in the CCP revelations.
Oh, right, you didn't answer that question. At what point of CCP inaction do even you conclude they've got nothing they feel confident to take to any prosecutor? (Their own Maricopa D.A. has told them politely he's not taking their silly ball and running with it). Is January, 2017, an outer limit for you? Or will you continue to wait and claim your hands are tied even past that?
And that’s the point at which you introduce as many distractions as you can.
When what you're alleging is some convoluted conspiracy to fake a death to remove a person from potential testimony, laying out the reasons why your theory of motive is highly flawed isn't what I'd call introducing distractions. It goes straight to the heart of your whole case.
I could explain why everything you’ve said is wrong, but not without betraying a confidence. Suffice to say that you have no idea what you’re talking about - and you are botching what Zullo has actually said.
It’s difficult to call the prosecution’s key witness an unreliable liar when your own witness has to plead the 5th whenever they are asked whether the prosecution’s claims are true. I’ve already explained that throwing mud is all the regime can do in defense of what they know the CCP has. If they can bring up the past statements of a now supposedly-dead “certifier” they can evade the discomfort of legal accountability. That’s what this regime is and always has been about.