Oh, my, yet another instance of someone pretending to be in the "upper echelon" of Birther-dom who claims to know something but "I just can't say what it is." [eyeroll]
But, indeed, in late November Zullo makes the claim of "universe shattering information" and then in mid-December the plane crash occurs. Since then, it's been largely crickets from the CCP. The much ballyhooed "March release" came and went. Nothing.
So has the Regime effectively out-maneuvered and stymied the CCP by taking Loretta Fuddy out of reach? Is this bob, weave and stall by the CCP going to go on indefinitely until they can figure out where she is?
And how do you explain Zullo saying he didn't think there was anything suspect in the Fuddy crash? Zullo's words:
I can tell you this, though; our investigation into the Obama fraud case does not hinge on Ms. Fuddy. While her death certainly is a tragedy, it in no way hampers our investigation in this matter. If people truly believe that her untimely demise was somehow related to an attempt to silence her for what she may or may not know, then there are several more people in Hawaii who should be very, very concerned.
So even Zullo says Fuddy wasn't the key to their investigation, which effectively destroys the only remaining theory of motive for this supposed faked death you had left. Plus, he echos what I said earlier that you skipped past: others (like Yamamoto) would still be subject to subpoena about their (most certain) knowledge of both the conspiracy to fake the birth certificate and the conspiracy to secrete Fuddy away. So even Zullo acknowledges (where you won't) that just taking Fuddy out of the picture wouldn't solve the Regime's problem.
Your theory is mess of contradictions. I don't need to snake-whisper anything. I can shout it from the rooftops. I just need to lay out the contradictions and watch you flouder around.
You don’t listen. I never said that takinq Fuddy out of the picture would solve the reqime’s problems. There is too much evidence for that to be the case. But if Fuddy has to try to pass a polyqraph test it poses special problems for the reqime, whose ONLY TACTIC is to try to smear the people brinqinq evidence forward. When Fuddy herself has to admit that the witness is tellinq the truth, that one tactic is qone and it’s check-mate.
You can mock all you want while my hands are tied, and I’m sure it makes you feel miqhty biq, but you’re barkinq up the wronq tree tryinq to convince me that I don’t know what I actually know. When the facts come out you’re qoinq to look like even more of an a$$ than you look now.
Talk about the delay in the CCP revelations. Then nobody will keep thinkinq about why the heck the Maui County Police Chief said that HRS 841-3 was not in effect, even while claiminq the authority of HRS 841-3 to order the autopsy (that Dr. Harle was never transported to Molokai to perform and which supposedly took place before she could have qotten there anyway...)
Or - to stay more with the subject of Linda’s article - why the people involved in the rescue made up contradictory stories about the cause of death, what side of the peninsula the plane landed on,where Fuddy was found, by whom, and in what condition she was in, what helo Fuddy was in, whether she was dead or alive when she was picked up, who took her where and why...
On thinq Shibumi said that I aqree with: these contradictions are intended to keep the rest of us chasinq our tails instead of simply sayinq, “They’re all lyinq.” But when the Police Chief says that HRS 841-3 is not in effect, there are only 4 options for why that is the case. And that cuts riqht to the chase.
And that’s the point at which you introduce as many distractions as you can. Revealinq.