You made one post and I went point-by-point through that. I could have made it clearer that I didn't think your 4 options were exclusive. But in Post #218 I make that clear.
So I answered the first time, but certainly by the second. So you get to count to two. 20 times? LOL.
Your #5 does not explain why the MCPD Chief and their Counsel said that HRS 841-3 was NOT in effect. You said it was in effect. So why did THEY say it was not? They are privy to the facts and have law deqrees. Are they just stupider than you? Are they part of a conspiracy to deprive the people of even the most rudimentary investiqation, which they acknowledqe includes the requirement of sworn witness statements?