NO! It should NOT have read "Sr." I wrote "Jr" and intended it to be Jr. You prove my point you can't read what I write without paraphrasing and changing what I say.
. . . So the sort of testimony you appear to be seeking is out there.”
Iow, Hook, the testimony you told me was ‘out there’ is precisely what is not out there. You seem incapable of processing that fact.
It is. The author interviewed friends and family of Stanley Ann and got their input, what I termed "testimony." And that included details about her mother-son relationship with Obama, JR. That was my point. And it's a true point. If you want a link, here's a link . You can buy the book and read for yourself. Or you can simply observe that quite a number of the 150 plus reviews note the author went and interviewed friends and family and that the author documents the mother-son relationship with Obama, JR.
No lie.
But, again:
"But, come now, Hawaii's verification of Obama's birth facts is HIGHLY RELEVANT to the question of Obama's birth; so relevant, in fact, that it moots your inquiry into things like "photos of the birth home" or "persons who witnessed Stanley Ann pregnant" (though Dr. Sinclair obviously was one such person). "
I predicted you would duck that one again, and you didn't disappoint.
You lack the intellectual capacity and/or forthrightness to engage in debate. When you duck my central point 20 plus times, you lose the debate. Period. End of discussion.
How many more times do you have to duck the question about which of the 4 scenarios explains why HRS 841-3 wasn’t in effect... before you’ve ducked it 20 times and thus lose the debate? I’ve lost track of which duck you’re on.
In context, the discussion was about Stanley Ann and Obama Sr. I noted that no biographer has been able to find any connection between the two. You said it had been done by Janny Scott. [Which is false. Scott beat the bushes and failed to find even one person who knew Obama Sr. and Stanley Ann were even acquainted, much less married.]
The new lie you are posting is just over the top. Are you really this dishonest? Can you actually sit there and type that I was looking for a biographer who had made some connection between Stanley Ann and Obama Jr? The most cursory reading of the discussion in which your post was made proves that is a lie.
Yet another one.
But this one is a bit much, even for you.
Btw, are ALL anti-birthers this irrational and dishonest? I am honestly beginning to think so. None of the others ever points out when one goes completely around the bend. Evidently, they all approve.
Sick.