The person you are debating is not interested in the truth. He will post something entirely untrue, and when called on it will split hairs, then split the split hairs, then dissemble, and if/when you finally nail him in a flat-out, undeniable lie [it isn’t easy; he’s as slithery as a sea jelly] he will pronounce it “irrelevant”.
Just so you know.
And what you call "untruth" and "lies" is just your distorting what I said, adding words I never said, then proclaiming it a "lie." That was well-documented on the prior thread.
But, come now, Hawaii's verification of Obama's birth facts is HIGHLY RELEVANT to the question of Obama's birth; so relevant, in fact, that it moots your inquiry into things like "photos of the birth home" or "persons who witnessed Stanley Ann pregnant" (though Dr. Sinclair obviously was one such person).
But since you lack the intellectual capacity and/or forthrightness to address that point, I ended the discussion. Since you're leveling your baseless charges against me here, I'm noting this for the record so everyone can witness how you avoid answering the point in the preceding paragraph yet again.