Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Fantasywriter
He will post something entirely untrue, and when called on it will split hairs, then split the split hairs, then dissemble, and if/when you finally nail him in a flat-out, undeniable lie [it isn’t easy; he’s as slithery as a sea jelly] he will pronounce it “irrelevant”.

And what you call "untruth" and "lies" is just your distorting what I said, adding words I never said, then proclaiming it a "lie." That was well-documented on the prior thread.

But, come now, Hawaii's verification of Obama's birth facts is HIGHLY RELEVANT to the question of Obama's birth; so relevant, in fact, that it moots your inquiry into things like "photos of the birth home" or "persons who witnessed Stanley Ann pregnant" (though Dr. Sinclair obviously was one such person).

But since you lack the intellectual capacity and/or forthrightness to address that point, I ended the discussion. Since you're leveling your baseless charges against me here, I'm noting this for the record so everyone can witness how you avoid answering the point in the preceding paragraph yet again.

199 posted on 11/13/2014 5:44:17 AM PST by CpnHook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies ]


To: CpnHook

It is a testimony to the depth and singularity of your dishonesty that even now you won’t admit it. I do get a laugh, though, at how you attempt to substitute personal insults for facts and evidence. That is childish and weak...but highly entertaining.

So I won’t have to go through the whole thing again, I have cut and pasted the lie. Even though you are incapable of admitting it, others can see it for what it is:

‘For something like the ten millionth time, here is what you said:

“There was at least one biographical piece done on Stanley Ann where the author went and spoke with persons who knew about her relationship with Obama, Jr[sic (should have read ‘Sr)]. So the sort of testimony you appear to be seeking is out there.”

It is a LIE. You lied. You look ridiculous trying to bluff your way past it. You LIED.’

Iow, Hook, the testimony you told me was ‘out there’ is precisely what is not out there. You seem incapable of processing that fact. But it’s so easy. If what you said was true, you could either post the exact quotes [of the testimony] or else link the biographical info in question. If it is not true, that info is nonexistent. [The answer is B, nonexistent.]

How can you not grasp this???

When you defend a pathological liar, such as Obama, your own integrity is the first thing you lose.


204 posted on 11/13/2014 6:54:04 AM PST by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson