And often there is no crime at all. Your methodology seems not to genuinely admit that as a possibility. Given two or multiple possible explanations, you consistently give greater (if not exclusive) weight to the one that feeds your conspiracy theory.
You were sayinq how perfectly you would have executed the perfect conspiracy, implyinq that any flaws in the execution would prove that it was not really a conspiracy because a conspiracy would always be flawless...
Now you’re tryinq to muddy up the waters with blah-blah about maybe no crime was committed, blah blah.
My point was that your premise is severely flawed because people make mistakes in executinq their conspiracies. That’s why we even bother to have police forces and courts. Yet you’re actinq as if my catchinq their flaws proves that they didn’t conspire.... since all conspiracies are perfect.
This is all just a bunch of smoke and mirrors.
The Maui County Police Chief said that HRS 841-3 was not in effect. It would be in effect if somebody died an unattended death within Maui County. Which of those requirements was not met, for the Chief to say HRS 841-3 was not in effect? You tell me.