Posted on 10/23/2014 3:57:29 PM PDT by Enterprise
That’s not guilfoyle is it?
I can't believe I'm saying this but I am tired of these moronic women who think they can 'wish away' poverty, evil, and anything bad.
A few months ago a (female)friend of mine told me guns should be banned at all churches. She'd never want to go to a church where guns were allowed.
What kind of thinking is that? And yes, she voted for Ebola.
Not Guilty!!!!
LOLOL!!
I genuinely cannot make sense of your post but I’ll try anyway.
Women got the right to vote in 1920 by way of the 19th amendment, passed by Congress. However, because the 2nd Amendment is considered a “natural right”, this right cannot be taken away from men, even though it is heavily “abused” by men.
But the 19th Amendment doesn’t fall under this belief, so it can be taken away, at least here in FR fantasyland. Taken away when men don’t like how some women vote. Is that what you’re saying?
What about all the men who vote in ways that many here believe are frivolous...or, you know...Democratic? They don’t count in this removal of voting rights?
Yes, she looks like one of those flaming trannys on some tranny stage show. She’s probably a pretty woman, but NOBODY needs that much makeup.
Only in the dark.
Out of everyone on “The Five” and the entire FOX Network, I like her the least. To me, she seems like a snooty b**ch.
I Like Money,,,
Let Laz pass judgment.
“I genuinely cannot make sense of your post but I’ll try anyway.”
Kinda makes my point.
“at least here in FR fantasyland. Taken away when men don’t like how some women vote. Is that what you’re saying?”
An emotional response?
“What about all the men who vote in ways that many here believe are frivolous.”
No. For women it would be frivolous, for men it would be
plain ignorant, not a emotional reaction.
“They don’t count in this removal of voting rights?”
No.
You know why? Because women are liberal in a sense by
nature. They want the best for their children. They will
marry a fat pig if he is a good provider and they will
vote for any politician that makes them the best deal no
matter who or how many pockets they have to fleece to
do it. They are the reproduction unit of the human race
and God made most of them very good at it. So good that
they will get down right cutthroat about it.
Men by the same token are analytical creatures, they come to conclusions based on fact alone and to hell with emotions.
...ok...I guess that explains Keith Olbermann, then...
...and don’t forget that rage is an emotion also, and men are perfectly capable of acting out of rage...
Out of everyone on “The Five” and the entire FOX Network, I like her the least.
...I like Tantaros better...more natural looking, and the legs are just as good...
“Women vote on a whim, men vote on principle. Men have honor, women don’t.”
I regret I must agree.
As a generalization: The consistent slide to communistic tyranny accelerated once the 19th Amendment was passed.
Television gave the presidency to reprobates like Kennedy, Clinton, and Obama because women are not only more emotional, but are also more sexual than is supposed: They vote for males they perceive as more handsome and/or more virile, regardless of his principles (or lack thereof).
Stereotypes exist for a reason; the statistics of the female vote are telling.
It is only wrong to assume that a specific woman is overly controlled by her emotions, et cetera; as a group they are costing us the Republic.
How does this ignorance you assign to men play into their 2nd Amendment rights? Any impact on it?
Same with my wife - she can't figure out why so many women are so in tune with their emotions that the rational side of the brain gets pushed aside. Unfortunately, there are many solid women who fully deserve the right; sounds like your mother is one of them.
100% spot on. That is exactly what "she" looks like and given that she was married to Gavin Newsom, who knows? Plus the fact that I just cant stand the shrill witch.
“How does this ignorance you assign to men play into their 2nd Amendment rights? Any impact on it?”
It’s simple, what part of “shall not be infringed” don’t they
understand. I believe that the founding fathers used the
word
“arms” because they knew that there would be advances in
technology. Also I believe their definition was anything one
man could carry. The folly is the acceptance that regulating
what guns you can and cant have is not a violation of your
second amendment rights. The second folly was believing
that the right to keep bear arms is for hunting or self
protection, which it is not. Besides there are some men
who shouldn’t be allowed to have guns, just not as big a
proportion as women who should not be allowed to vote.
I believe it should be mandatory that all women have a
gun. In fact they should be armed and proficient with a
hand gun in order to vote. That alone should either weed out
the dingbats or give them the right respective on things.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.