How does this ignorance you assign to men play into their 2nd Amendment rights? Any impact on it?
“How does this ignorance you assign to men play into their 2nd Amendment rights? Any impact on it?”
It’s simple, what part of “shall not be infringed” don’t they
understand. I believe that the founding fathers used the
word
“arms” because they knew that there would be advances in
technology. Also I believe their definition was anything one
man could carry. The folly is the acceptance that regulating
what guns you can and cant have is not a violation of your
second amendment rights. The second folly was believing
that the right to keep bear arms is for hunting or self
protection, which it is not. Besides there are some men
who shouldn’t be allowed to have guns, just not as big a
proportion as women who should not be allowed to vote.
I believe it should be mandatory that all women have a
gun. In fact they should be armed and proficient with a
hand gun in order to vote. That alone should either weed out
the dingbats or give them the right respective on things.