No, the greater threat is multiple votes from many tens of thousands of “legal” voters ...
That’s the reason downtown - close to the voters, wlaking distance to every polling place, good public transit, many voters not working - so they can vote any time of day, etc, etc, etc are ALWAYS the LAST to report in to the secretary of state their results.
They need to know how many votes to manufacture in what races.
So Ginsberg is for removing any ID check for gun purchases immediately, since of course, ID is too much of a burden for a constitutionally protected right. She’s against ID check to tour the United States Supreme Court, since of course, the constitution protects peaceful assembly and presentation of redress by the citizens.
How about ID check for abortions, a requirement for the digital medical records?
It is amusing how liberals find the idea of ID distasteful in only one particular instance. But then again, without double standards, liberals wouldn’t have any standards at all.
I think she knows this, and is voting to enable it.
So gargoyle Buzzy equates the Voter ID laws with the old 19th Century poll tax? She needs to be returned to her perch high up on some historic building facade from whence she came and let saner minds prevail. Everyday is halloween with Buzzy on the bench.
Ginsberg didn’t quite think it through. When people who shouldn’t vote, or people vote illegally multiple times, it devalues each legitimate vote. People who want to vote but don’t have the documentation do that by choice.
I just hope we win in November, the Ginsberg can go ahead and die.
The old dyke does it backwards too.
What evidence is there that this is a “purposefully discriminatory law”?
Is there any evidence of that at all?
Quick, call Zeke - she is way past her expiration date.
An idiot in a black robe is still and idiot.
Poll tax huh?
Then just pay people a nominal amount to get a voter ID.
And if they are disabled have someone go to them to take the ID photo and issue the ID.
How then could it be a tax if the state pays you cash to get it and if needed will come to your home to issue it :-)
Much better to fork out a little cash than have massive voter fraud.
Justice Ginsburg by her own words tells you who she is and what she is. If all people have to show a voter ID, then how can you pose the argument that it is racist? You can’t! If all people have to do it, how can you postulate that it discriminates against some but not the others? She is an old lady, so people are letting her get away with this crap. If she were younger, people would be sitting on her. They just use the idea that she is partially senile, and I think she is to offer an argument such as this.
If I need a permit to exercise my 2nd amendment rights because “reasonable” regulations are permissible, it must be constitutional to require an ID to vote.