Skip to comments.
Amber Vinson's family-revealing she was not under-travel restrictions-and did NOT call the CDC...
Daily Mail ^
| 10/16/2014
| Louise Boyle
Posted on 10/18/2014 9:30:22 AM PDT by ncalburt
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2797063/amber-vinson-s-family-leap-defense-revealing-not-travel-restrictions.html
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: ambervinson; ebola; frieden; friedenvinson; phan; thph; thphtimeline; timelinethph; uspatient2; uspatient3; vinson; vinsonfamily
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 181 next last
To: ncalburt
This foreigner's deceit isn't worth putting so many lives in danger. Travel from infected nations needs to be stopped now.
61
posted on
10/18/2014 9:59:50 AM PDT
by
boycott
To: ncalburt
Everybody should get a grip. Only source that she DIDN’T call are SUPPOSEDLY her parents. And the Daily Mail is really only a semi-credible source anyway. Their bread and butter is sensationalism.
62
posted on
10/18/2014 10:00:07 AM PDT
by
catnipman
(Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
To: ncalburt
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said that Vinson called the agency several times before flying, saying that she had a fever with a temperature of 99.5 degrees. But because her fever wasn’t 100.4 degrees or higher, she didn’t officially fall into the group of “high risk” and was allowed to fly.
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/ebola-nurse-called-cdc-several-times/
63
posted on
10/18/2014 10:00:12 AM PDT
by
DBrow
To: ncalburt
she has a Texas nursing license. She is responsible by the laws within that certification to understand and abide by infection control precepts.
she, like Obama, are above all laws of nature and man, until it bites them, or us, in the buttocks.
64
posted on
10/18/2014 10:01:09 AM PDT
by
stanne
To: moehoward
Yeah--I'm not convinced either way, but this is in the Brit press. It's not like I have any belief that the CDC is honest, but let's see how the family of the bride does. It's beginning to sound like she was infectious earlier than we believed. Seems to me that we have lots of deception around this outbreak.
Does anyone watch House, MD? What does he always say about human beings when confronted with their mortality?
65
posted on
10/18/2014 10:02:34 AM PDT
by
Mamzelle
To: dragonblustar
no offense .
She is a licensed nurse in a Isolation ward not a clerk at Walgreens.
She was licensed nurse working in the ebola isolation ward and had a coworker who just got sick dye to unknown exposure and was told to self quarantine.
Now we learn she was sicker than first reported which is code for she
hide or ignored her own symptoms . I hope she did not get suck some low information clown walking around sick and thinking its allergies.
66
posted on
10/18/2014 10:02:35 AM PDT
by
ncalburt
( Amnesty-media out in full force)
To: Lorianne
Was he a observation patient which could be a overnight stay but not considered an inpatient stay ?
67
posted on
10/18/2014 10:03:59 AM PDT
by
ncalburt
( Amnesty-media out in full force)
To: ncalburt
68
posted on
10/18/2014 10:05:03 AM PDT
by
Textide
(Lord, grant that I may always be right, for thou knowest I am hard to turn. ~ Scotch-Irish prayer)
To: mware
I would think that anyone who had a known connection with patient zero would be given a direct phone line number to someone in charge. But that is just me. You'd think the government would be competent and efficient, but it most usually is not.
As the great Ronald Reagan said, "The nine most terrifying words in the English language are, 'I'm from the government and I'm here to help.'"
69
posted on
10/18/2014 10:05:13 AM PDT
by
NYRepublican72
(Democrats -- it's always someone else's fault.)
To: Mamzelle
Does anyone watch House, MD? What does he always say about human beings when confronted with their mortality?I dunno, but if he's as good a philosopher as he is a diagnostician, the first things he would say would be wrong.
70
posted on
10/18/2014 10:05:18 AM PDT
by
jiggyboy
To: ncalburt
Sounds like this family probably had a visit from Rev Jackson..something stinks!
I’m sure $$ is the reason..
71
posted on
10/18/2014 10:06:32 AM PDT
by
rainee
(Her)
To: Raebie
Yes, that is the odd part .
the CDC has made both statements but her family confirmed she did not call.
72
posted on
10/18/2014 10:07:09 AM PDT
by
ncalburt
( Amnesty-media out in full force)
To: Raebie
She's black. Frieden knows the racial politics and racial obsessions, and he knows that Obama loves to put white people in the line of fire and blame.
Wonder if she was one of those who were "discriminating" against Duncan?
Does anyone remember in 08 and 09 how Obama went around saying how he *liked* nurses, implying that he despised doctors? Nurses are more likely to be unionized.
I think we are in a world where lies are truth, and truth is lies.
73
posted on
10/18/2014 10:07:20 AM PDT
by
Mamzelle
To: jiggyboy
“Everybody lies”—and personnel in an ER know that better than anyone else in the hospital.
74
posted on
10/18/2014 10:08:22 AM PDT
by
Mamzelle
To: jiggyboy
“Everybody lies”—and personnel in an ER know that better than anyone else in the hospital.
75
posted on
10/18/2014 10:08:24 AM PDT
by
Mamzelle
To: ncalburt
The headline is misleading. It states that she contacted Texas health officials who contacted the CDC on her behalf and relayed their response back to her. So in effect she did contact them, albeit indirectly. She did what she was supposed to do. Let’s not hang her over that.
If you were ill and you were a health provider at a hospital and needed to know whether it was safe to travel, who would you contact? The people you know and had contact information for, or some anonymous clerk at the end of a directory assistance phone call?
There’s enough misinformation out there without adding to it with salacious headlines that merely border on the edge of the truth.
To: NYRepublican72
Possible, but how many hours was he in the ER? What time did he come in and what time did he leave. The Daily Mail story says he left "then next morning". Everyone who came contact with him at the ER would not have been wearing protective clothing because they (apparently) did not even suspect Ebola at that time.
77
posted on
10/18/2014 10:08:58 AM PDT
by
Lorianne
(fed pork, bailouts, gone taxmoney)
To: ncalburt; Admin Moderator
You made up this alleged headline, didn’t you? In your haste to instigate a panic by mischaracterizing the summary, you misspelled both “Amber” and “confirm”.
78
posted on
10/18/2014 10:09:11 AM PDT
by
jiggyboy
To: ncalburt
From the article:
Miss Vinson did contact Texas health officials as she had been told to do, who contacted the CDC on her behalf and relayed the information back that she was safe to travel on Monday as her 99.5F fever was beneath the 100.4 threshold. Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2797063/amber-vinson-s-family-leap-defense-revealing-not-travel-restrictions.html#ixzz3GW8eKZBe Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
She DID call. Same thing as...
79
posted on
10/18/2014 10:10:46 AM PDT
by
The Ghost of FReepers Past
(Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
To: Sooth2222
What.
The title was abbreviate due to space limits .
So whats your problem.
Her confirmed she did not get permission from the CDC .
That the guts if the story.
What are you spinning .
80
posted on
10/18/2014 10:10:52 AM PDT
by
ncalburt
( Amnesty-media out in full force)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 181 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson