Replies

Reply 95: There’s a whole list of topics upthread you ignored. you first. Then I’ll be glad to address yours.

Only fair.

Ok, I've been "fair" and posted below are every single one of your replies on this thread with your "topics up thread" and, you know what, Norm? There's not a single substantive thing you've said to address in a single BLEEPING one of them! Not a single thing.

As I said before, getting anything out of you is like nailing jello to a wall!

NORM LENHART's replies in this thread.

Reply 8: Don’t forget all the staunch rock ribbed conservatives already making plans to give more of their cash to fund a company that openly attacks -everything- they claim to believe in and redistributes that money to the DNC and other leftist causes.
You can identify them easily by how much the above simple truth ‘offends’ them.
Reply 13: Buy everything used. Starve the beast.
Reply 17: Yea and?
Reply 21: It makes all sorts of sense. Most of us don’t need any more power than a year old machine provides anyway. So why help fund our problems?
It’s just consumerism and ego. What do we want more? an end to Liberalism or new I toys?
Reply 26: And I previously reminded you that Apple is a major sponsor of liberal causes. If you want to promote that, you are what you are.
Reply 30: Unless that shopping spree is used, I imagine it will help fund lots of abortions, land closures and such.
Since contrary to what one guy here believes, thats the stuff Apple does with your money. Donates it tax writeoff included, to those groups.
Reply 33: Truth hurts huh? Still the truth.
Reply 36: My far left machine was bought in pieces from companies that don’t massively advertize their liberalism, some of it used, and parted together. Apple got none of it.
So again...Yea and?
Reply 38: Show any lie. Any.
Reply 42: Show one thing I said that isn’t documented truth. One.
Reply 44: You are exactly the guy Post 8 predicted.
Reply 45: You are correct. 4 ish years ago I bought Win7. Not one thing from them since.
I am a bad bad man.
Reply 48: It’s not sanctimony Saul. It’s the simple truth. People proud of sending their cash to a place like apple with a long record of attacking conservative ideals and funding Democrats really shouldn’t be bitching about liberals.
Again. If anyone has a problem with it, it’s on them. But it’s still the truth.
Reply 53: Toss in the non direct political spending, the gay propaganda tv commercials, the environmental BS, the Global warming/world citizen bucks as well and retotal.
If you want to knowingly support that, be my guest. Just don’t expect for people to believe you are a conservative for doing it.
Reply 54: What I prefer doesn’t matter of course but since you asked, I’d prefer people upheld the ideals they pat themselves on the back here claiming to have.
Or at least try.
Reply 56: So are you saying that we should all come here bitching about libs and then be proud of funding them? Where do you suppose they get the money to fund the things we are against? The tooth fairy?
You might want to consult that dictionary yourself. That word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
Reply 59: Dude, buy whatever you like. Giving your money to Apple is what it is. No justifying BS changes what they do with it And it ain’t conservative. So don’t expect praise and a participation trophy for helping fund liberalism.
Reply 60: Civil is not funding people destroying everything we believe in to the best of our ability. Do you disagree?
Don’t bother replying. Neither of us will change our position.
Reply 63: Great. Supporting apple is a conservative thing to do now.
Since the core of your position wholly applies to the porn and abortion industries as well, lets buy their pros\ducts and services too for the reasons you stated. And support them because it’s conservative to do so.
Reply 67: Some people find all sorts of value in porn and abortion. Thats why they are multi billion dollar industries worldwide. Your surface level logic supports that. It is also the core principle of crony capitalism.
So I will leave you to your lovefest.
Reply 69: How exactly do you rationalize multi billion dollar industries with no ‘value’? How? In detail. Lets see it.
Obviously their is value to someone. It is there. it exists. It is traded and spent and saved and bought and sold.
Reply 71: it? you honestly don’t accept the near daily news articles about their donations, the TV commercials filled with social justice? The Eco campaigns? Need I go on? Are you one of 5 people on the planet that somehow missed them?
Just what DO you require for proof? WHAT?
Reply 72: The only thing with substance and I've already addressed it.
Reply 74: Translated: “Truth hurts and I got nothing to defend my position”.
Got it. Whose running away now? Tell you what. Lets just agree to disagree because you aren’t winning this and I’m not gonna change your mind.
Reply 76: You tried saying there was no ‘value’ in multi billion dollar industries and you claim I am daft?
Buddy, that is stupid on a whole new scale.
Reply 78: No, I am reading them fully. Your replies read like a liberal economics term paper.
Reply 88: Well sport, you and the crew just go right on believing all that. Seems awful funny though that rather than address anything I said, ALL of which are legit points made across FR daily on a variety of topics, you choose to put your desire for your products over all else.
Reply 90: Submit one for ‘conservatives’ proud of funding lib companies also. Just to cover all the bases ;)