Replies

the retina display is truly stunning.

Id love to have a standalone display with that sort of resolution but they claim that making such displays would be prohibitively expensive..and therefore wont be done.

9 posted on 10/08/2014 7:12:15 PM PDT by MeshugeMikey ("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill)

To: MeshugeMikey

They make good high display resolution, say this 28” 4K monitor at 157 PPI or 3840 x 2160.

http://www.amazon.com/PB287Q-28-Inch-Screen-LED-Lit-Monitor/dp/B00KJGY3TO/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1412826042&sr=8-2&keywords=4k+monitor

But it’s not a Retina screen level where 250 PPI at 20” viewing distance for a 21.5” screen would be about right for an Apple Retina screen iMac. . . Resolution of 4,675 x 2,625. That would be amazing. I suspect Apple may go lower. . . Maybe 220 PPI. That would be more than good enough at that distance. 4,114 x 2,310.

64 posted on 10/08/2014 8:59:13 PM PDT by Swordmaker (This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users continue...)

To: MeshugeMikey

There are already 4K displays on the market. Way beyond retina.

105 posted on 10/09/2014 6:09:02 AM PDT by AFreeBird

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794