Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Flag_This

Why would the romans mark the start with Julius when the senators killed him for it? They didn’t mark the start, Augustus self-declared, as Julius was doing. After Brutus and Cassius were defeated who would disagree with Augustus?

In my readings of Livy etc. The Romans took over various tribes, cities and territories and greatly expanded, as I referenced. They didn’t say hey look at the Roman Empire. They just called it Rome and referred to various provinces.

When we look back at the geography it is a simple mater to call it an empire whether the senate or the emperor ruled at a given time.


77 posted on 10/03/2014 6:30:29 PM PDT by morphing libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]


To: morphing libertarian

“Augustus self-declared,...”

Not really. He NEVER called himself “Emperor” iirc.

The historian Werner Eck states:

The sum of his power derived first of all from various powers of office delegated to him by the Senate and people, secondly from his immense private fortune, and thirdly from numerous patron-client relationships he established with individuals and groups throughout the Empire. All of them taken together formed the basis of his auctoritas, which he himself emphasized as the foundation of his political actions.


82 posted on 10/03/2014 6:42:39 PM PDT by narses ( For the Son of man shall come ... and then will he render to every man according to his works.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson