[Darksheare]

Sorry, opposing abortion does not equate to having blood on ones hands.

” And you have blood on your hands if you actively disagree.”

I disagree wholeheartedly.
And those who support or push abortion on FR, even as an “acceptable evil” in a candidate are compromised in character and integrity.
If you are willing to compromise on that, who and what else will you sell out?

[Kansas58]

Then YOU have blood on YOUR Hands if you would oppose late term abortion restrictions, as the “no compromise” crowd in Kansas did for years.

You have blood on YOUR hands if you oppose parental consent legislation, as the “no compromise” crowd in Kansas did for years.

[Lakeshark]

As far as I know, the Kansas guy Roberts is pro-life, strongly so. I hoped for his opponent to win in the primary, Wolfe or something like that, but he didn't. This wasn't like the skulduggery in Mississippi, it was simply a loss to the incumbent, who isn't on the same bad list as, say Grahmnesty.

The "independent" who will caucus with the entirely pro-death democrats if he wins, appears to be pro-death.

Seems like a no brainer to me.