1 posted on
09/15/2014 12:48:03 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
To: BenLurkin
To: BenLurkin
3 posted on
09/15/2014 12:50:17 PM PDT by
Sparticus
(Tar and feathers for the next dumb@ss Republican that uses the word bipartisanship.)
To: BenLurkin
Let’s get them for our border!
4 posted on
09/15/2014 12:51:33 PM PDT by
jimmyo57
To: BenLurkin
Maybe I'll get one for the end of my driveway
6 posted on
09/15/2014 12:51:55 PM PDT by
Paine in the Neck
(Socialism consumes EVERYTHING)
To: BenLurkin
Put down that Big Gulp and step away.
You have 10 seconds to comply... You have 9 seconds to comply... You have 8 seconds to comply...
-PJ
7 posted on
09/15/2014 12:52:53 PM PDT by
Political Junkie Too
(If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
To: BenLurkin
9 posted on
09/15/2014 12:53:23 PM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
("The man who damns money obtained it dishonorably; the man who respects it earned it." --Ayn Rand)
To: BenLurkin
What could go wrong?
11 posted on
09/15/2014 12:54:08 PM PDT by
Kartographer
("We mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.")
To: BenLurkin
I, for one, welcome our new robot overlords.
12 posted on
09/15/2014 12:54:28 PM PDT by
FreedomPoster
(Islam delenda est)
To: BenLurkin
I am going to wait until they come with a Plasma Rifle in a 40 watt range! ;-)14 posted on
09/15/2014 12:56:58 PM PDT by
Kartographer
("We mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.")
To: BenLurkin
If the Norks ever invade south Korea it will literally be World War I vs. Star Trek/Wars......
16 posted on
09/15/2014 12:58:59 PM PDT by
GraceG
(No, My Initials are not A.B.)
To: BenLurkin
I would think this would quickly become a kidnap target, similar to what happened to our drone near Iran.
So it needs the following:
- To be hardened against hacking and radio interference, including GPS interference.
- The ability to instantly delete it's software if captured except for the self destruct module.
- The ability to self destruct if captured.
- The ability to identify when other sentry's are threatened and attack their antagonists.
17 posted on
09/15/2014 1:03:17 PM PDT by
DannyTN
To: BenLurkin
18 posted on
09/15/2014 1:05:51 PM PDT by
Ray76
To: BenLurkin
To: BenLurkin
Having the sensors connected to the weapon system seems rather limiting. It seems like you could deploy remote robotic sensors which could detect enemy heat/motion/noise signatures and relay appropriate firing coordinates back to robotic artillery or grenade launchers or 25 mm chain guns or whatever. such a sensor could differentiate between mechanized targets and human targets and communicate to an appropriate weapon system for that matter.
20 posted on
09/15/2014 1:15:04 PM PDT by
RC one
(Militarized law enforcement is just a nice way of saying martial law enforcement.)
To: BenLurkin
The US-Mexico border is 2000 miles long, if each machine can keep, say, 300 feet secure ... we'll take 35,000 of those please.
22 posted on
09/15/2014 1:18:53 PM PDT by
BitWielder1
(Corporate Profits are better than Government Waste)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson