Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: FlJoePa
PA's case for obstruction rested entirely on the "prisoner's dilemma."

The obstruction cases are based on the illogical conclusion that because we've discovered what Sandusky did in hindsight, there must have been a cover-up. That's the kind of "thinking" that all conspiracy theories require. Unfortunately for the Commonwealth, none of the people charged with a crime can turn on the others, because except for Sandusky's transgressions, there was no crime.

19 posted on 09/11/2014 6:32:25 PM PDT by FredZarguna (His first name is 'Unarmed,' and his given middle name is 'Teenager.')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: FredZarguna

Pretty much. If any of the 3 were guilty of anything, they’d have turned on the others.

Anyone that knows Curley knows these charges are an absolute joke. Guy’s probably never received a parking ticket.

Spanier’s defamation suit against freeh is still ongoing. Could be interesting to see how far that makes it. No one expected Corman’s suit to make a dent and it wound up eliminating some of the sanctions.

At some point Kane is going to have to drop the charges against C/S/S and that will hopefully allow some more transparency. Of course it will be blamed on a technicality (corrupt idiot cynthia baldwin).


20 posted on 09/11/2014 6:40:23 PM PDT by FlJoePa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson