Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: tacticalogic; BroJoeK; JimSEA; ShadowAce

Here’s a website that sums up the fraud of evoltionists to date - quite well done imho esp. for a Wordpress article.

http://evolutionisntscience.wordpress.com/evolution-frauds/

Apparently Haeckel [is this where we got the term hack?] was convicted of fraud by his university peers. but as for most of the others apparently it was left for God to judge ultimately.

1st paragraph is really quite good too.

“In 1859, in his book Origin of the Species, Charles Darwin said: “Why, if species have descended from other species by insensibly fine gradations, (why) do we not everywhere see innumerable transitional forms?”. This is from chapter six entitled Difficulties on the Theory. Scientists who believe evolution have been searching for transitional forms ever since but they have been not found. Therefore, fraudulent fossils have been made and presented as transitional forms.”


92 posted on 09/17/2014 9:26:16 AM PDT by BrandtMichaels
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]


To: BrandtMichaels
Here’s a website that sums up the fraud of evoltionists to date

Then Haeckel is the only evolutionist so far.

95 posted on 09/17/2014 9:32:15 AM PDT by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

To: BrandtMichaels

If a fraud is detected, good science will correct it (ie. Piltdown Man). Why would have to respond to something written 150+ years ago. It’s a bs tactic used in in debates and is meaningless now. He didn’t find a crocoduck and no one ever will.


103 posted on 09/17/2014 10:11:19 AM PDT by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

To: BrandtMichaels; tacticalogic; JimSEA; ShadowAce; afsnco
BrandtMichaels: "Here’s a website that sums up the fraud of evoltionists to date - quite well done imho esp. for a Wordpress article.
Evolution Frauds, according to Evolution is not Science website "

I counted nine alleged "frauds".
Of those nine, the four are ancient history, scientific mistakes corrected by science itself, just as it should be.

The other five represent serious "frauds" only in the sense that this particular report on them is major fraudulent, from the minor details to what it implies.
For one example, it suggests something "fraudulent" in the science on Neanderthals, because one scientist was alleged to have fudged some of his age-dates.

But the science on evolution of pre-humans does not depend on one scientist or one fossil.
In fact, there are hundreds of pre-human & early human sites, yielding bones or fossils representing thousands of individuals in dozens of species or sub-species living over the past seven million years.

Here is a partial listing of some of those.

And here, yet again, is a display of those allegedly non-existent "transitional forms".


106 posted on 09/17/2014 11:09:30 AM PDT by BroJoeK (a little historical perspective..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson