BTW I’m not your pal and what I loathe and despise is how many have abandoned their faith supporting what they think is science.
All ‘historical science’ violates the scientific method. Neither is evolution observable nor repeatable. Not too mention you can not simulate long time passages in any scientific experiments.
BrandtMichaels: “BTW I’m not your pal”
What, is English your second language?
In ordinary usage, the word “pal” means something else, which certainly describes you, pal.
BrandtMichaels: “what I loathe and despise is how many have abandoned their faith supporting what they think is science.”
No, what they KNOW is science, your legally-illegitimate efforts to redefine it notwithstanding.
I’ll say it again: you are totally entitled to believe whatever you wish, just so long as you don’t call your religious beliefs “science”.
BrandtMichaels: “All ‘historical science’ violates the scientific method.”
Only in your illegitimate fantasies.
In the real world, all of science is based on certain assumptions, including naturalism and uniformitarianism.
And just because you loathe & despise those assumptions does not make them “unscientific” or your religion a form of “science”.