I oppose evolution yet love science so your claim fall flat. Evolution is pure fiction neither scientific nor observable fact.
There is more science in this book than in all of the evolutionary fields combined, but then you appear to be too close-minded to read for yourself.
Center for Scientific Creation - In the Beginning: Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood
http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/IntheBeginningTOC.html
Yet the fuel in your car, the metals it’s made of and the diamonds in your wife’s ring were all discovered using deep time and incrementalism.
Agreed. There’s a world of difference between observational science and “historical” science. Biases inevitably enter the picture on the latter, because no human being was there.
Evolutionists inevitably believe the universe created itself, and that life created itself via spontaneous generation, something that was disproved by Pasteur over a century ago. Even the most “simple” single-celled organism is stupendously complex, and it’s downright laughable to believe that such complexity could just magically spring from lifeless chemicals. Such (misguided) faith they have! They have no idea how it happened. They just have faith that it did. Yet creationists’ faith is somehow invalid and “unscientific.” There’s a logical disconnect there somewhere.
BrandtMichaels: “Evolution is pure fiction neither scientific nor observable fact.”
No, pal, your beliefs are pure fiction, or rather pure religious faith, having nothing to do with real science.
Which, by the way, you are forbidden by US law from redefining according to your faith-claims.
What you call “historical sciences” are still science, regardless of how much you loathe & despise them.