I know exactly what you've posted on this thread -- you defended BrandtMichaels and squabbled semantics with tacticalogic.
You stated specifically that "evolution is not science", and that is the precise remark my comments address.
Are you telling us now that you disassociate yourself from BrandtMichael's religious beliefs, but still classify evolution theory as "not science"?
I did discuss semantics and grammar--neither of which indicates my beliefs.
I have no idea what BrandtMichaels' beliefs are, so I cannot dissociate nor associate myself from/with them.