Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ShadowAce; tacticalogic; BrandtMichaels
ShadowAce: "The problem, though, is that evolution is not science--which is why they can claim 'consensus.' "

By every conceivable definition, evolution theory -- along with other elements of what are sometimes called "historical sciences" -- are parts of science-in-general.

Efforts by anti-scientists such as BrandtMichaels and now ShadowAce to have evolution declared "non-science" and their own religious beliefs to be a "part of science" went all the way to the US Supreme Court, which ruled that: no, evolution is science, and religion is not.

And speaking of "settled science", that is settled law!

109 posted on 09/17/2014 11:21:22 AM PDT by BroJoeK (a little historical perspective..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]


To: BroJoeK
You have no idea what my "religious beliefs" are, thus you have no idea what it is am actually saying.

Quit trying to mind read.

110 posted on 09/17/2014 11:24:04 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies ]

To: BroJoeK

Using the opinion of the latter-day US Supreme Court does not bolster your opinion - rather it detracts from anything even remotely defensible. Are these the same folks who approved of Obamacare?


112 posted on 09/17/2014 11:43:59 AM PDT by BrandtMichaels
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies ]

To: BroJoeK

So your arguments are so weak that you must resort to every liberal tactic in their handbook?


114 posted on 09/17/2014 11:48:19 AM PDT by BrandtMichaels
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson