he stated Joe Paterno had to have known when Sandusky was arrested. Sandusky was not arrested in 1998.
...ok, so you caught Golic saying ‘arrested’ when he should have said ‘investigated’...proving what...? what is your point...?
Later that morning, Colin Cowherd stated that Joe Paterno should have known that Sandusky had been to a grand jury in 1998. There was no grand jury at that time. Cowherd also asserted that Paterno should have fired Sandusky in 2001. That would have required Joe Paterno to have re-hired him
...fine...you’ve confirmed that Cowherd is a lamebrain twit who runs his mouth when he should be stuffing it...but we all know that already...
...all you’ve accomplished is to show that much misinformation and speculation was tossed out during this whole mess...but again, everybody knows that, and furthermore how does that differ from any other high-impact event that’s ever happened...?
...it doesn’t prove or disprove anything about Paterno and the Sandusky affair...it is devoid of any real insight...
You discount the effect golic and cowherd have on an instant gratifiation/need it now audience.
Where do you think most of this very forum learned what they know from this case? You think they read the actual freeh report? The Clemente Report? The Thornburgh Report?
Of course they didn’t. They learned it from espn scrolls, misleading headlines, and blurbs from fools like golic and cowherd.