Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: TigerClaws

That certainly would be a vast jump of analogical reasoning, from strains of finches to races of people, and not even Charles was willing to embrace all of what we call animal Darwinism today (e.g. he would admit the attribution of such a “perfected” thing as the eye to divine design). It seems that simplified stories are what we recount today, not the messy details.


5 posted on 08/24/2014 2:09:37 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: HiTech RedNeck

“(e.g. he would admit the attribution of such a “perfected” thing as the eye to divine design). “

Darwin says the human eye evolved ... like everything else we know. This was in his book “Origin of Species”.


7 posted on 08/24/2014 2:25:05 PM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: HiTech RedNeck

The Neanderthals were the smartest...but they were randy as stoats and bred themselves out of existence.


19 posted on 08/24/2014 2:44:06 PM PDT by DJlaysitup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson