Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Sherman Logan

“So the cycle is fossil fuel to electricity to hydrogen to work.

Anybody want to bet burning fossil fuel directly to generate work wouldn’t be more efficient?”

There you go again, throwing reality in to destroy another enviral wet dream.


33 posted on 08/22/2014 11:19:14 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (Our Sunni White house isn't surprised at the beheading. They are surprised at the publicity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: Grampa Dave

There truly are some “enviros” that are desiring some energy source that “doesn’t pollute”. Often when you point out the folly and the actual INCREASED “pollution” of the alternative they are supporting, they get really offended and mad.

That’s when you know this person is deriving their self-righteousness from their advocacy.

The truly evil, sick side of this is that people use this desire for righteousness to manipulate the sheeperals into supporting policies whose real goal is to disallow “commoners” the use of ANY resources, because those resources “rightfully belong to” the elite.


39 posted on 08/22/2014 11:23:33 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: Grampa Dave

Since hydrogen is essentially a type of battery, I wonder how its efficiency compares to other types.


45 posted on 08/22/2014 11:40:32 AM PDT by Sherman Logan (Perception wins all the battles. Reality wins all the wars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson