[Pearls Before Swine]

“objectively reasonable” force. Couldn’t they have knocked on the friggin’ door and served a warrant?

[Uncle Miltie]

No. This was the police punishing the serfs for getting uppity.

[christx30]

No. For most of those men, the only way they can get sexually excited is to kick down doors and hold guns at the heads of innocent people. If there was a puppy to kick or shoot, it would have been even better.
Absolutely useless humans, these new cops.

[old curmudgeon]

“objectively reasonable” force. Couldn’t they have knocked on the friggin’ door and served a warrant?

---

What are you thinking?

A 68 year old woman and a teen age girl!

How could you expect a cop to knock on the door when such dangerous people are inside?

The chief and every member of that detail should be fired immediately.

This is coming to your town.

It may be there already, just waiting.

[OneWingedShark]

The claim is that the warrant was objectively reasonable -- that's irrelevant under the Fourth Amendment of the US Constitution and the Art 1, Sec 11 of the IN Constitution which is a word-for-word copy of the Fourth (the only discrepancy being the casing of of two words 'oath' and 'warrant') which direct that:

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable search or seizure, shall not be violated; and no warrant shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the person or thing to be seized.

Did the warrant particularly describe the computer[s] that were seized? Probably not.