>>You could have answered the question instead. What’s scientific about said theory? You don’t start with a conclusion and seek observations that might fit it, since it prejudices how you perceive the observation; that is unscientific at its core. Never mind the lack of observation of phenomena related to the conclusion. Cart before the horse.<<
You, along with many, don’t know what a Scientific Theory is.
You can opine until the cows come home but your sophistry does not change the fact you have no idea what we are talking about.
Nice try though. I give you a B+ on the BS o meter.
I gradually came to disbelieve in Christianity as a divine revelation. …Scientists are supposed to be objective. Here, Darwin clearly was not.