“So, your definition of an approximation is an approximation. Sounds like a tautology to me...”
I’m not defining approximation, I’m trying to explain why approximation, by its nature, is incapable of achieving what the author of the article claims that it can.
If you have a problem with that, take it up with Plato.
>>If you have a problem with that, take it up with Plato<<
Perhaps Plato’s approximation Spoon-o.
;)
Virtual drinks are sill on me :)