I am wondering what the real agenda is. When AIDS appeared, the real agenda was to protect homosexuals from being stigmatized, so for a long, long time they tried to obfuscate the fact that gay sex was the primary means of spreading it. The secondary agenda was to protect IV drug users from the stigma. They were willing to risk the lives of all Americans (including, ironically, homosexuals and drug users) in order to do this.
With Ebola, I have to speculate on the following possibilities:
1. Avoid stigmatizing Africa.
2. Intentionally damage the US and its citizens. (Most of the other actions they have taken have accomplished this, so why not spread a plague, too.)
3. Some sort of tie-in with 0bamacare.
4. Population reduction. The left hates actual people and would love to kill a lot of them off “for the good of the planet.”
5. Financial incentives. Possibly my top guess. Someone always profits. Who stands to make the most money from anti-Ebola drugs? Who makes the most money if there is widespread panic? Who makes the most money if people hunker down?
6. Political incentives. How might this affect the upcoming elections? The 2016 election? Martial law? Who gets more power? (No surgeon general at this time. Who else might benefit? Head of CDC?)
It does make you want to reach for the roll of Reynold’s Wrap, doesn’t it?