That's quite probable; however, we don't have a living Constitution that means whatever we want it to say — this is to say that we must respect the limits imposed by Constitution even, especially, when it hinders our own desires.
Most of these problems still aren't properly addressed in law; but in the lives of Christians.
As an example: do you think we would have half the problems [divorce, infidelity, homosexual-marriage, etc] if those that said that they were Christians treated marriage like something special/sacred in their own lives? Even if that is flawed and would have little impact on those numbers, do you think that such a moral stance would be a hindrance or a help in life WRT witnessing? (A single candle is more appreciated at midnight than in the noonday sun.)
There is nothing in the constitution that is forcing you to support abortion and gay marriage and homosexuality at the federal level, that is your own passionate politics.
You are fighting for the recent status quo of the left and libertarian gains at the federal level, and fighting us who want regain the lost ground against such things at the federal level.
Remember that the Congress was passing laws regarding marriage in federal employment in 1780, 1794, and 1798, and 1802.