[ansel12]

That's quite probable; however, we don't have a living Constitution that means whatever we want it to say — this is to say that we must respect the limits imposed by Constitution even, especially, when it hinders our own desires.

There is nothing in the constitution that is forcing you to support abortion and gay marriage and homosexuality at the federal level, that is your own passionate politics.

You are fighting for the recent status quo of the left and libertarian gains at the federal level, and fighting us who want regain the lost ground against such things at the federal level.

Remember that the Congress was passing laws regarding marriage in federal employment in 1780, 1794, and 1798, and 1802.

[OneWingedShark]

There is nothing in the constitution that is forcing you to support abortion and gay marriage and homosexuality at the federal level, that is your own passionate politics.

I'm not supporting abortion or homosexual marriage at the federal level — you are a fool if that's what you think, as what I said federal government has no authority there is not equivalent to the federal government should support them.