Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

As much as I comment on some "bad cop" threads, I DO want the police to be able to catch the bad guys. I guess Holder doesn't think that is the main purpose for police; he thinks it is an employment agency.
1 posted on 08/01/2014 5:49:06 AM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Rusty0604

Ask any cop, a female cop is much more likely to pull her gun. Too often, the women don’t have the strength to subdue the bad guys.


2 posted on 08/01/2014 5:50:52 AM PDT by old and tired
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rusty0604

71% passed.....which means it is easily obtainable. Not discrimination at all.


3 posted on 08/01/2014 5:51:10 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rusty0604

They can reference the women in Corpus Christi who split the $700K pot for NOT being cops to enhance their pitch for the Fluke Vote.


5 posted on 08/01/2014 5:55:52 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rusty0604
Seems to me the requirements for the job are fair and non-discriminatory. That is, if there is a situation it is going to require a certain level of physical ability to deal with it. Suspects aren't going to say "Gee, it's a woman trying to apprehend me, I'll only fight 3/4 as hard as if it were a man..." Or carrying that unconscious person out of harms way doesn't magically become easier just because the trooper is a woman.

In other words it takes a certain level of physical ability to perform the job safely, period. Therefore the physical fitness requirement should be the same no-matter who is applying.

Guess what, men and women are different. In general there are differences in size and physical strength between men and women. That's not a gender bias, it is a well documented and studied trait of our species. (our species is not alone in this either, it is quite common) No amount of liberal hand-wringing and wishing we were all truly equal in some unicorn dotted landscape will change that basic fact.

Apparently the physical requirements are not particularly stressing as what, 94% of men who apply pass the test? Ok, it is likely that only people reasonably fit even apply, but that is still an extremely high pass rate. Apparently 71% of women who apply pass too. That is also a great pass rate. It tells me that passing the test is not impossible for women, and in fact nearly 3 out of 4 women who try it do pass.

11 posted on 08/01/2014 6:07:46 AM PDT by ThunderSleeps (Stop obarma now! Stop the hussein - insane agenda!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rusty0604

So the PA State Police use equal standards? I remember when radical feminists were screaming for equality. Now of course we have moved far beyond equality in many areas to preferential treatment regardless of the outcome.


15 posted on 08/01/2014 6:10:12 AM PDT by armydawg505
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rusty0604
DOJ Says Pa. State Police Discriminated Against Women Who Flunked Physical Fitness Tests

The meaning of the word "discriminate" is "to differentiate between good quality and bad quality."

16 posted on 08/01/2014 6:10:35 AM PDT by Dr.Deth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rusty0604

For Holder’s department to take on this problem given all of the Constitutional infractions this clown is involved in seems to me that he’s rearranging the deck furniture on the Titanic.


19 posted on 08/01/2014 6:39:55 AM PDT by econjack (I'm not bossy...I just know what you should be doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rusty0604
Any objective measurement with a minimum passing score is discriminatory by definition. They discriminate against those who can't pass. Because they are objectively measuring physical attributes regardless of sex they are not discriminating against women, just those not strong enough to do the job.

In my state there used to be a requirement for state police that they must be a minimum of 6' tall. This was waived for women and is in fact a clear case of discrimination.

20 posted on 08/01/2014 6:40:10 AM PDT by Durus (You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality. Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rusty0604

Will the DOJ chip in for the funeral costs for dead cops due to PC?


22 posted on 08/01/2014 6:42:34 AM PDT by Bogey78O (We had a good run. Coulda been great still.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rusty0604

Why should they limit social engineering to only the military?


25 posted on 08/01/2014 7:46:25 AM PDT by afsnco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rusty0604

What, criminals don’t respect female cops enough to slow down for them?


27 posted on 08/01/2014 7:58:45 AM PDT by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rusty0604

Are the requirements necessary. Is the standard equally held? Then it’s fine.


30 posted on 08/01/2014 9:24:14 AM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rusty0604

This should be under the heading; “You can’t make this stuff up.”


32 posted on 08/01/2014 10:32:30 AM PDT by itsahoot (Voting for a Progressive RINO is the same as voting for any other Tyrant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rusty0604

The racist communist running the “Just Us” department scores another fabricated discrimination case.

To call him a POS is a vast understatement.


36 posted on 08/01/2014 10:47:07 AM PDT by jimt (Fear is the darkroom where negatives are developed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rusty0604

Just like the military, different standards for different folks.

Wait until they start letting minorities graduate with 50’s instead of 70’s...

some places probably already do


38 posted on 08/01/2014 10:57:41 AM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson