[agere_contra]

The best answer to CO2 sequestration is of course ‘why?’

[TigersEye]

Exactly! The planet has it handled. There is no "Greenhouse Warming" except in Algore's thick skull.

No smoking hot spot

1. The greenhouse signature is missing. We have been looking and measuring for years, and cannot find it.

Each possible cause of global warming has a different pattern of where in the planet the warming occurs first and the most. The signature of an increased greenhouse effect is a hot spot about 10km up in the atmosphere over the tropics. We have been measuring the atmosphere for decades using radiosondes: weather balloons with thermometers that radio back the temperature as the balloon ascends through the atmosphere. They show no hot spot. Whatsoever.

If there is no hot spot then an increased greenhouse effect is not the cause of global warming. So we know for sure that carbon emissions are not a significant cause of the global warming. If we had found the greenhouse signature then I would be an alarmist again.

[JimSEA]

Not the legal act of sequestration but: “”The process of removing carbon from the atmosphere and depositing it in a reservoir.” In this case, it may recommend geoengineering to reduce industrial sources of CO2.