Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: KeyLargo
I think that article you posted to me is BS written under pressure from Insurers which want many diagnostic test stopped to cut their cost. IF my dad had gotten a routine PSA test it could have been contained rather than spreading to the Pelvic bone before they discovered it. It would have likely spared him radical surgery. As healthy as he was otherwise he may well have lived into his 90's. He was other than the Prostate cancer in good health. So much for studies.

Men with a family history of Prostate cancer should get both PSA and digital checks each year. It's just common sense. Most doctors don't worry till the number hits above 10. It's wise to watch it. Elevated PSA numbers may or may not mean it is the aggressive type which the doctors do need to treat ASAP.

This is like telling women with family history of Breast Cancer not to do early preventative screen {mammogram} at an earlier age. I have a niece who would probably be dead had she not insisted. Yeah you bet your bottom dollars insurers would like to have that test limited also.

Myself along with my doctor should be the ones to determine if I need treatment or a preventative screening and not a bunch of Board Apes in the pockets of HMO's writing papers of their opinions trying to make such policy.

I do find it odd {sarcasm} that dad's Oncologist and Urologist both tested his PSA levels to monitor his cancer along with bone density test. Testing them told them when they needed to change type of treatment. There is a large movement going on in the HMO's & private insurers to re-write protocols & eliminate as many screenings as possible and they'll pay anyone to say anything. If Richard J. Ablin wishes to chance it that is his right. His rights end when he tries to impose this own actions or change protocols for others.

23 posted on 07/27/2014 4:12:55 PM PDT by cva66snipe ((Two Choices left for U.S. One Nation Under GOD or One Nation Under Judgment? Which one say ye?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: cva66snipe; KeyLargo

I’m also suspicious that a doctor is against the PSA test. But, as it turns out, the National Cancer Institute also is warning against the PSA test:

http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/detection/PSA

Their argument is that sometimes radiation is unnecessary to kill the cancer, but the rads could harm the patient.

Still, I’m in favor of the PSA test. What the patient and his doctor decides to do is up to the patient.

During my radiation treatments, there was a man with prostate cancer scheduled for radiation at the same time of day. He told me that, at first, his doctors caught the cancer very early. He didn’t receive radiation or chemo - only surgery. After surgery, they told him he had nothing more to worry about.

Now, here he was again, this time receiving radiation because they found that the cancer spread to a nearby lymph node. So, you just can’t tell what will happen. I hope he’s OK.


24 posted on 07/27/2014 5:17:31 PM PDT by Tired of Taxes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson