Now you're a liar.
If your religion computer was so great, why isn't the world beating a path to its door?
ROTFLMAO! You really don't have a clue, do you? Apple has never sought to dominate market share. . . Apple cares about what is far more important to be beating a path to their door: profit share! Here is a circle graph of the last quarter's world wide PC profit share for 2012, before the market drop in Windows PC sales. . .
. . . and it has only gotten better for Apple since then as the Windows PC sales have dropped while Mac sales and margins have grown. Last year Apple's topped 55% of all world wide PC sales profit share. So, the world has in a sense, been beating a path to Apple's door, bringing money, to buy the computers you denigrate.
Apple is the most valuable corporation in the world by market cap. . . It's now worth over $570 billion. The next closest company, Exxon Mobile, is worth $440 billion. Again evidence that the world is beating a path to Apple's door.
You whine like a little girl, it's a computer, not a heart lung machine machine but to listen to you, it saves lives, reduces global warming and replenishes the oil supply.
God! You can't have a civil conversation without insulting people can you? You are truly pathetic. The ad hominem attack is the refuge of the man who is bereft of facts. I have not "whined" at all. I have merely called you out on your bratty behavior. You are an ignorant, bratty, nasty piece of work who simply cannot stand to be disagreed with. . . You lash out at people you don't know with invective and insults. You behave like an ass.
I have attempted to have a civil conversation with you, but you refuse to even try.
I guess when you imagine that you're on the right side of history, the ad hominem attack against TXnMA was justified.
WHAT AD HOMINEM ATTACK ON TXnMA? You can't even be bothered to read what I write to you! You've not even bothered to check your facts, which makes you an idiot. You just see I responded, pull out your shotgun and blast away! I'll repeat it for the reading comprehension challenged. . . and the apparently totally bigoted, blind idiot you've turned out to be. AND I'LL SHOUT, TO GET THROUGH YOUR ABYSMALLY THICK SKULL. DennisW is the ONLY PERSON WHO ATTACK ANYONE ABOUT CAR PROJECTS, YOU IDIOT!!!!
Try reading what was written, for a change.
Does your domestic partner have to put up with this on a daily basis?
Again with the slur that I must be in a homosexual relationship. Do you do much projection? Frankly, you are coming across as really mentally ill, Lx. I suggest you seek help. Your aggressiveness suggests you may hurt others close to you.
Did I hit a a juicy target? Based on your writing, I don't think a Pulitzer is in your future and anyone can be an editor, ever hear of Wikipedia? You're frothy writing style is indicative of what, a ten year old? Embrace your MAC, it's probably all you have.
If you had accomplished all you say you have, you'd not even bother with an FR post.
Again, more attacks. You are not hitting any targets at all. Your attempts to start a flame war are pathetic. Your writing is poor. . . Repetitive and unimaginative, trite and banal. You repeat myths and untruths. And, no, not anyone can be an editor. It takes a special skill set to know what to remove to improve writing. There is no good writing, there is only good rewriting. Your attempts at getting me angry fail. You are a said pathetic, little wimp. You do ruin threads though. Sad. Your insults chase people out of the threads. They just leave, not wanting to be bothered reading the invective. They complain to me, so I try to stop people like you from doing it. I don't hit the abuse button because I don't want you to be banished from FR for breaking the rules.
You just refuse to take the hint.
Try just discussing things without insulting people. It is possible to disagree without attacking the character, background, intelligence, sexual orientation, and everything else about them. Try it, you might find it works better for you. Oh, and try reading what they actually say, rather than what you want to think they said. Don't put your interpretation of it into their mouths as quotes they supposedly said. Bad form. Time for this response, including searching for the graphic: 32 minutes. Quit implying I'm lying. Again, that won't win you brownie points in a debate. Some people who've written professionally can bang out things quite rapidly. Oh, and I was Multi-tasking. . . watching Pawn Stars with my girlfriend.
You call me a liar but I'm nasty, no, I'm just a man who doesn't whine when his favorite whatever is attacked, I don't care that much, debating with your serious case of Dunning Kruger is enjoyable, pushing your buttons is easy, did I hit a raw nerve or nerves?
This whole thing started because VMWARE (a competitor of Microsoft's) published an article that MACS were taking the world by storm.
"Microsoft Windows has dominated enterprise desktops for close to three decades but it appears its reign is coming to an end. As BYOPC ["Bring Your Own PC"] and BYOD [Bring Your Own Device] continue to transform the enterprise, Macs have become a popular and preferred option compared to Windows PCs," says Erik Frieberg, VP of Marketing, End-User Computing, VMware, in the report. That is clearly hyperbole (and we'll show you why in a minute), but VMware's research does jibe with other stats that show Macs are finally making significant inroads in the lucrative enterprise market.
I hope I didn't violate FR's fair use policy.
First, let's add the grains of salt: This survey was a mere 376 people, hardly big enough to showcase the whole world of corporate PC use. It was commissioned by a company that is trying to sell software that competes with Microsoft. VMware wants companies to buy what's known as "virtual desktops," where users download Windows and Windows apps over the network on any device they want, such as a Mac. They would do this instead of buying new Windows PCs. That said, VMware uncovered some interesting nuggets. Employees are asking for Macs, not just iPads. 73% of respondents said they are supporting Macs because users are asking for them. Only 40% said they are using them to run applications that only run on the Mac.
73% of respondents said they are supporting Macs because users are asking for them. Only 40% said they are using them to run applications that only run on the Mac.
376 respondents, did they pole Apple?
I don't want to paste the graphic in case it gets FR in trouble but here's the link to the whole article.
Mac suffers delusions they are Microsoft or Oracle
376 users, would you make a stock purchase on the recommendations of 376 people especially if they were involved or stood to make a gain?
Nice graph, one maker, Apple against six others, tsk tsk, a might bit dishonest.
You might want to read your screed, again, numerous ad hominems and you don't hear me whine, why, because I'm a man baby!