Skip to comments.
The Universe Shouldn't Be Here, According to Higgs Physics
Live Science ^
| 06/23/2014
| Tia Ghose
Posted on 07/03/2014 11:34:01 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
To: SeekAndFind
They have to find the real god particle, Higgs wasn't it.
21
posted on
07/03/2014 12:24:14 PM PDT
by
BitWielder1
(Corporate Profits are better than Government Waste)
To: SeekAndFind
The universe shouldn't exist
I knew it! This weird lifetime I've experienced has all been an illusion and I don't really exist.
Which explains the mail I receive addressed to "occupant".....
22
posted on
07/03/2014 12:28:33 PM PDT
by
Hot Tabasco
(By now, everyone should know that you shoot a zombie in the head. Don't try to reason with them...)
To: SeekAndFind
But, but 97% of scientists believe in the Big Bang!
23
posted on
07/03/2014 12:36:14 PM PDT
by
FroggyTheGremlim
("It is not the color of his skin, ... it is the blackness that fills his soul")
To: SeekAndFind
What if God instead of creating a universe, created instead a computer simulation of one, Let there be light was the power switch being turned on or the program starting up and compiling was the big bang....
I could write for a stoner magazine, LOL
24
posted on
07/03/2014 12:41:25 PM PDT
by
GraceG
(No, My Initials are not A.B.)
To: SeekAndFind
Wait. Let me get this straight:
I'm a scientist. I have a new theory that says the universe shouldn't exist.
But it does exist.
Therefore, the my theory proves that the universe is wrong.
What am I missing?
25
posted on
07/03/2014 12:41:54 PM PDT
by
Maceman
To: Phillyred
“Seems like the stuff these people believe takes more faith than simply acknowledging there is a Creator.”
Yup. There’s a book on that: “I Don’t Have Enough Faith to be an Atheist” by Geisler & Turek. (It’s basic apologetics for the layman.)
26
posted on
07/03/2014 12:42:43 PM PDT
by
shoe212
(One of the few Conservative professors in the Midwest.)
To: SeekAndFind
I thought it was settled science that we were here.
27
posted on
07/03/2014 12:44:23 PM PDT
by
Starstruck
(If my reply offends, you probably don't understand sarcasm or criticism...or do.)
Big Bang Theory?
Click The Pic To Donate
Support FR, Donate Monthly If You Can
28
posted on
07/03/2014 12:52:17 PM PDT
by
DJ MacWoW
(The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
To: DJ MacWoW
29
posted on
07/03/2014 1:04:50 PM PDT
by
Sergio
(An object at rest cannot be stopped! - The Evil Midnight Bomber What Bombs at Midnight)
To: I want the USA back
Actually they do see that, and you would have seen they see that had you bother to spend 2 second reading instead of jumping in using your preconceived notions to call other people stupid.
30
posted on
07/03/2014 1:11:22 PM PDT
by
discostu
(Ladies and gentlemen watch Ruth!)
To: deweyfrank
Maybe it was God.
Science, tying itself in knots, to explain the divine, they cannot explain.
To: Moonman62
God has provided abundant evidence that when it comes to the physical universe he wanted it to be understandable, predictable, and he refrained from magic. Sorry, this God-loving / God-fearing semiconductor designer can tell you...
...that while God may have wanted His physical creation understandable to a point (thanks, God, for the limited speed of light, seriously!)...
...it is categorically not predictable (quantum dynamics)...
...and when considering things like the observer effect and quantum entanglement, it pretty darn close to "magic"!
To: 98ZJ USMC
The Universe Shouldn't Be HereIt isn't.
Our Mind Represents the World (and in fact only Senses a small fraction of Reality) and thus the World we see is an Illusion (Maya) and this Ignorance of the True Nature of Reality is Avidya.
33
posted on
07/03/2014 1:59:56 PM PDT
by
Robwin
To: Yossarian
...it is categorically not predictable (quantum dynamics)... Quantum dynamics is highly predictable, otherwise you wouldn't have a job. As one time Freeper and scientist, Physicist used to say, quantum physics is the most precise science we have.
34
posted on
07/03/2014 2:00:57 PM PDT
by
Moonman62
(The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
To: Moonman62
Quantum dynamics is highly predictable, otherwise you wouldn't have a job. As one time Freeper and scientist, Physicist used to say, quantum physics is the most precise science we have.I can calculate the probability of a single event happening, but I can't predict the results of a single event. This becomes quite the real problem when devices only have but a handful of electrons to do their work with.
To: SeekAndFind
This bent and squeezed space-time, creating ripples known as gravitational waves that also twisted the radiation that passed through the universe, Hogan said.
That makes no sense, scientific or otherwise...
How can there have been "radiation that passed through the universe"? Where did that radiation from from? Was it external from the universe? If so, where did the external radiation come from?
36
posted on
07/03/2014 2:20:16 PM PDT
by
adorno
(Y)
To: SeekAndFind
They need to use the Three Amigo’s (Hansen, Mann & Jones) Global Warming computer model. Just enter the desired result and the data necessary to arrive at that result will be generated ... it works every time .....
37
posted on
07/03/2014 2:20:25 PM PDT
by
RetiredTexasVet
(Surgeon General Warning: Operation of Government Motors vehicles may be hazardous to your health)
To: Yossarian
Scientists have been doing experiments with single electrons and photons for a long time now. The results are highly predictable. They do use probability, but that is also a branch of mathematics, and I don’t know of any competent scientist or mathematician who would equate it with the supernatural or magic.
38
posted on
07/03/2014 2:49:48 PM PDT
by
Moonman62
(The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
To: Moonman62
Scientists have been doing experiments with single electorons and photons for a long time now. The results are highly predictable. When done time after time, the aggregate of the results follow probability very closely. A SINGLE EVENT IS NOT PREDICTABLE.
I dont know of any competent scientist or mathematician who would equate it with the supernatural or magic.
How about this guy?
He famously referred to quantum entanglement as spukhafte Fernwirkung, translated as "spooky action at a distance".
Here's another freaky occurrence to keep in mind: Observer Effect. Watch this movie to learn more about it.
Hence my comment as "pretty darn close to 'magic'"....
To: Yossarian
Is it more accurate to say that quantum particles are guided by the hand of a supernatural being or that they follow the rules of quantum dynamics?
40
posted on
07/03/2014 6:33:12 PM PDT
by
Moonman62
(The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson