Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ExxonMobil votes against expanding pro-homosexual employment policy for the 17th time
lifesitenews.com ^ | 05/31/2014 | KIRSTEN ANDERSEN

Posted on 05/31/2014 6:40:21 PM PDT by massmike

Homosexual activists are outraged after ExxonMobil once again refused to explicitly include sexual preference in its anti-discrimination policy, marking the 17th time the company has done so.

New York State Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli has led the charge to add sexual preference to the gas company’s equal opportunity policies, which currently state that individuals employed by or seeking employment with the corporation will be evaluated without regard to “race, color, sex, religion, national origin, citizenship status, age, genetic information, physical or mental disability, veteran or other legally protected status.”

ExxonMobil argues that their “zero-tolerance” standards for discrimination already exceed federal regulations and apply equally to every worker, regardless of sexual preference. The company has also offered full benefits to legally “married” same-sex couples since the Supreme Court struck down key provisions of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in 2012.

But homosexual activists say it’s not enough for ExxonMobil to simply declare all discrimination out-of-bounds: they want homosexuals and transgender people specifically highlighted as off limits.

Some gay activists have called on Barack Obama to issue an executive order forcing the company to comply with their demands.

(Excerpt) Read more at lifesitenews.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: corporateliberalism; exxon; exxonmobil; gaybullies; homosexualagenda; lavendermafia; mobil; thoughtcrime
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: left that other site

wow...what a visual !


21 posted on 05/31/2014 8:29:20 PM PDT by kingattax (America needs more real Americans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: massmike

This is one reason why I always shop at Exxon Mobile if I have a choice (in the area)!!!!


22 posted on 05/31/2014 8:47:24 PM PDT by JSDude1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike

What are the “openly gay” homosexuals going to do? Boycott them? ROTFL! Sexual deviants are sickos.


23 posted on 05/31/2014 8:49:21 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Obama's smidgens are coming home to roost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike

DiNapoli is like Cuomo. They just can’t stand to have those evil free enterprise type organizations in New York. Gotta find a way to ‘encourage’ them to get outta da state!


24 posted on 05/31/2014 9:04:16 PM PDT by Rembrandt (Part of the 51% who pay Federal taxes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike

“The company has also offered full benefits to legally “married” same-sex couples since the Supreme Court struck down key provisions of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in 2012.”

Exxon has already given in to the homosexual activists and give benefits to the gays and their lovers.


25 posted on 05/31/2014 9:53:53 PM PDT by Oliviaforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike
...called on Barack Obama to issue an executive order forcing the company to comply with their demands.

Huh?!?

-PJ

26 posted on 05/31/2014 9:57:56 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike

...or mental disability, ...
***********************************
Yep. Already covered.

It’s becoming beyond tiresome to see the constant pushing for special status by the LGBT crowd.


27 posted on 05/31/2014 10:03:46 PM PDT by octex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike

“But homosexual activists say it’s not enough”

Isn’t that kind of what they always say?


28 posted on 05/31/2014 10:21:25 PM PDT by DemforBush (A repo man is always intense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike
" . . . will be evaluated without regard to “race, color, sex, religion, national origin, citizenship status, age, genetic information, physical or mental disability, veteran or other legally protected status.”

So they will hire a mentally disabled person to be their corporate spokesperson, and a physically disabled person to perform complex physical tasks?
29 posted on 05/31/2014 10:44:08 PM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike

They’re covered already under the “mental disability” protection.


30 posted on 05/31/2014 10:56:15 PM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike

he can’t write a lawful eo against a private company. eo’s are only for executive agenices.


31 posted on 05/31/2014 10:58:38 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike
Some gay activists have called on Barack Obama to issue an executive order forcing the company to comply with their demands.

Whaaaaaat???

I had no idea that oil companies were part of the executive branch of government.

32 posted on 06/01/2014 12:46:26 AM PDT by Washi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike

Shite

I’ll buy more Tony this week for sure.

Go Exxon.

Are any of the Blaffers still kicking?

Only old Texas folks will understand that...


33 posted on 06/01/2014 1:07:53 AM PDT by wardaddy (we will not take back our way of life through peaceful means.....i have 5 kids....i fear for them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson