Skip to comments.
Chelsea Clinton expects baby this fall
Seattle Times ^
| 04/17/2014
Posted on 04/17/2014 6:06:12 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 last
To: SeekAndFind
what a barf statement. the more female “leaders” we have the worse the world goes.
41
posted on
04/17/2014 7:00:34 PM PDT
by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: SeekAndFind
“...she or he will grow up in a world with so many strong female leaders”
What a repulsive, self-serving, totally stupid way to announce a pregnancy. And then the poor thing will be inheriting all those gross genes.
42
posted on
04/17/2014 7:05:09 PM PDT
by
EDINVA
To: SeekAndFind
43
posted on
04/17/2014 7:07:03 PM PDT
by
GGpaX4DumpedTea
(I am a Tea Party descendant...steeped in the Constitutional Republic given to us by the Founders)
To: SeekAndFind
“Gramma Clinton 2016”
... I’m not sure that bumper sticker is gonna go down well with this new ‘selfie’ generation of voters.
44
posted on
04/17/2014 7:11:18 PM PDT
by
LittleBillyInfidel
(This tagline has been formatted to fit the screen. Some content has been edited.)
To: tet68
Hillary is going to run, the pieces are now all in place. Plus they probably spent a hundred thousand getting her preggers just for the campaign. the visuals are just too good to pass up... I had the same thought when I heard the news. The Clintoons are always calculating. Now a baby as a campaign prop - no low is too low for these scumbags.
45
posted on
04/17/2014 7:13:23 PM PDT
by
mplsconservative
(Barack Hussein 0bama has American blood on HIS hands!)
To: digger48
46
posted on
04/17/2014 7:18:46 PM PDT
by
PLMerite
To: SeekAndFind
47
posted on
04/17/2014 7:25:44 PM PDT
by
MV=PY
(The Magic Question: Who's paying for it?)
To: bergmeid
BINGO!!!!! Who gives a rats ass.
48
posted on
04/17/2014 7:27:21 PM PDT
by
Busko
(The only thing that is certain is that nothing is certain.)
To: SeekAndFind
49
posted on
04/17/2014 8:19:34 PM PDT
by
proudpapa
(Scott Walker - 2016)
To: SeekAndFind
didn’t the court conveniently decide the DNA of a POTUS couldnt be made public, so there was no way to prove paternity?
This woman might be the most attractive I’ve seen associated with Slick Willie, certainly one of the more attractive. His taste in women overall leaves much to be desired.
50
posted on
04/17/2014 8:51:26 PM PDT
by
EDINVA
To: SeekAndFind
I don’t know why they’re calling it a “baby”, she has a parasitic clump of cells which it is still her option to remove if she so chooses. In her leftist circles, I think a “baby” is only considered to be someone who has managed to escape his mother unharmed.
51
posted on
04/17/2014 11:16:27 PM PDT
by
Tenlein
To: SeekAndFind
...I certainly feel all the better whether its a girl or a boy that she or he will grow up in a world with so many strong female leaders, Clinton said in New York...Just had to politicize even this event.
How did she get pregnant? I have never seen a picture of her together with her husband since the wedding.
52
posted on
04/18/2014 1:41:49 AM PDT
by
Rummyfan
(Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
To: SeekAndFind
The baby will be voting in NOVEMBER. Dems will let babies of libs to vote. (Of course, I bet babies are smarter then Dems)
53
posted on
04/18/2014 5:39:12 AM PDT
by
ExCTCitizen
(I'm ExCTCitizen and I approve this reply. If it does offend Libs, I'm NOT sorry...)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson