Posted on 04/17/2014 6:06:12 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
Chelsea Clinton, the 34-year-old daughter of former President Clinton and ex-Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, announced Thursday that she and her husband, Marc Mezvinsky, are expecting their first child this fall.
For the Clintons, 2014 is the year of the baby.
Chelsea Clinton, the 34-year-old daughter of former President Clinton and ex-Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, announced Thursday that she and her husband, Marc Mezvinsky, are expecting their first child this fall.
There has been wide speculation about a future baby in the Clinton family. Chelsea Clinton said in an interview with Glamour magazine last year that she and her husband were hoping to start a family soon, calling 2014 “the year of the baby.”
“Marc and I are very excited that we have our first child arriving later this year and I certainly feel all the better whether it’s a girl or a boy that she or he will grow up in a world with so many strong female leaders,” Clinton said in New York, joined by her mother at a Clinton Foundation event on empowering women.
(Excerpt) Read more at seattletimes.com ...
what a barf statement. the more female “leaders” we have the worse the world goes.
“...she or he will grow up in a world with so many strong female leaders”
What a repulsive, self-serving, totally stupid way to announce a pregnancy. And then the poor thing will be inheriting all those gross genes.
Poor Kid!
“Gramma Clinton 2016”
... I’m not sure that bumper sticker is gonna go down well with this new ‘selfie’ generation of voters.
I had the same thought when I heard the news. The Clintoons are always calculating. Now a baby as a campaign prop - no low is too low for these scumbags.
That is soooo creepy!
BINGO!!!!! Who gives a rats ass.
didn’t the court conveniently decide the DNA of a POTUS couldnt be made public, so there was no way to prove paternity?
This woman might be the most attractive I’ve seen associated with Slick Willie, certainly one of the more attractive. His taste in women overall leaves much to be desired.
I don’t know why they’re calling it a “baby”, she has a parasitic clump of cells which it is still her option to remove if she so chooses. In her leftist circles, I think a “baby” is only considered to be someone who has managed to escape his mother unharmed.
Just had to politicize even this event.
How did she get pregnant? I have never seen a picture of her together with her husband since the wedding.
The baby will be voting in NOVEMBER. Dems will let babies of libs to vote. (Of course, I bet babies are smarter then Dems)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.