Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

“Sluts” SHOULD be ashamed. That’s what the word MEANS - abusing sexuality to the level of shaming oneself.

If the word “slut” doesn’t mean “shamed” anymore, then shame is removed from the concept of sexual self-abasement.

And that means that sexual self-abasement is denied as existing.

And that means that there is no way for girls to learn limits about sexuality - because there are no bottom-line standards.

And from that comes the intense self-loathing that is the root drive of liberalism.

Anyone else see a goal-seeking agenda here on the part of the Left, in the name of sexual “freedom”?

There’s a difference between abusing the word “slut,” and denying the existence of the meaning of the word “slut.” The first is wrong, and should be stopped. The second is catastrophic, and destroys entire cultures.


20 posted on 04/06/2014 6:26:29 PM PDT by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Talisker
There's a good scene in the Tom Cruise "Jack Reacher" movie in which a woman in a bar yells, "He called me a whore!"

Her brother suddenly appears and towers over Tom and says, "Is that true?"

"Well, no one said whore. She inferred hooker ... but I meant slut."

22 posted on 04/06/2014 6:31:07 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson