Jimmy Hoffa, maybe?
I’m no expert, but what are the chances that it is not Dicky the Third? Based on statistical evidence, pretty slim I’d say. I saw the program where they recovered the bones. I mean, the skeleton found where he was reputed to be buried, the reconstruction, the DNA. What are the chances it could be somebody else?
He observes that the remains could belong to one of dozens of descendants of Richard’s maternal grandmother Cecily Neville, Duchess of York 1415–1495) wife of Richard Plantagenet, the 3rd Duke of York, and the mother of two kings of England had 16 children, many descendants of whom would’ve been involved in the 15th-Century fighting and perished on the battlefield.
***
Try diagramming that sentence! Dang! How many online writers bother to proofread these days, I wonder.
Warzynsky notes that Leicester University maintains that its identification of the skeleton as Richard III’s is based on at least six separate lines of evidence, including a contemporary reports of the location of Richard’s grave and the nature of the skeleton.
***
Six lines of evidence sounds pretty convincing, but I guess it is wise for the experts to want to see all of the papers first. But this dissenter is not too convincing, IMO.
