Lol! Since you showed a photo of people walking past her casket and looking in, I don’t think it is necessary to know their names to know that people looked at the casket and thought it was Fuddy. If they thought it wasn’t Fuddy, they would have spoken up right?
Some guy claiming to be a James Ah Lo who worked with Fuddy went on my blog to chew me out for being so insensitive. But even HE - who wanted to debunk my claims - never said he saw her body in the casket, which is the obvious thing for somebody to say to rebuke the claim that her body wasn’t in that casket.
It’s neither here nor there whether they say they saw her body, because it could easily be a wax double anyway, but it is very curious that even when trying to chew me out nobody will say they saw the body in the casket.
And why the photoshopping by kitv?
See, it doesn’t make any difference to me whether there was what appeared to be a body in the casket or not. The only reason I’ve said anything about it is because the photoshopping is bizarre. The appearance of the casket from above, in the image we know is authentic from the Honolulu Diocese website, is bizarre. It is not what I expected, and there’s no reason for it to be that way - ESPECIALLY if there was anything posing as her body in that casket.
Her pasty white hands from the kitv image are supposed to be the dark blob in the Diocese image? None of her body (elbows, stomach, etc) shows from above even though the lining of the casket that’s visible shows the depth to which we are able to see into the casket itself? And why the photoshopping in the kitv images?