I’m too swamped to bother with the ministers of disinformation here. They’re all going to ignore the point of this article, which is a very good one: the coroner speaks like an apologist for what he/she DIDN’T find, not a scientific presenter of what was actually found.
The fact is the coroner found no cause of death so should have just said they don’t know what the cause of death was. Instead, they tried to sell everybody on the death being natural, absent evidence of what the cause of death was.
This is not a scientific analysis of evidence, it is sheer psychological speculation. It’s no wonder they are illegally hiding this record from civilians but giving access to the same liars in the media who have been doing cover for this lawless regime all along.
Those are the critical points from the article - and very, very good points - but don’t expect those to be addressed by the clown section here or anywhere else. Alinsky trumps evidence, every time, in places where the clowns run wild.
Let’s look at some practical issues with your theory. Can you explain in your analysis whether the other passengers on the plane knew in advance the plane was going to crash, and agreed to go on it anyway, even neglecting to put their life jackets on before ditching in the water. Yeah, right. Or, they were told afterwards (by who, where, when - in the water, in the hospital - when did the G men get to them all?)and were so ok with it they didn’t say a word? What about before the G men got to them - or were they waiting in the rescue vehicles? And that didn’t attract anyone’s attention? And neither did all Fuddy’s friends and relatives - even the Republicans - notice she wasn’t in her open casket coffin? Of course that’s what happened - because elderly overweight women never, ever have heart attacks when they are in the most stressful situations of their lives. After many years of stress being harrassed by birthers.
Hello butter.
They didn’t have a body. That’s why the autopsy report reads like fiction.