Facts are facts. Imagination is not fact.
One of the most convincing forms of evidence is an admission against someone’s own interest. What I’ve got in these images is what ABC allowed millions of people to see, claiming that it would blow away the questions that the “crazy conspiracists” had. This is the evidence given by the people who think people like me are crazy.
Is there something wrong with looking at the evidence they presented? Is there something wrong with noting that there are dark-skinned faces that should not have been there?
These images are not as clear as I would prefer, but if ABC thought they were clear enough to show what was going on, then shouldn’t the question be on the table, as to what WAS going on, and what is really in those images? Why did they pixelate the images, if they show what would clearly blow away people like me?
What IS the facts, Jim???
Flight 370 crashed in the Indian Ocean or “safely” in Pakistan, Israel or Diego Garcia. Is Admiral Lyons an evil Conspirator???