Like this woman?
Posted on 03/31/2014 10:55:40 AM PDT by ethical
Is that sentence in English? I have no idea what that means.
Interesting, IIRC, one justice was not present and stood up at the mentioned SOUA whispering “NOT TRUE”???
You are garbling two separate event involving two separate justices. Alito wouldn't meet with Obama and Biden because Biden voted against Alito's confirmation. Scalia met with Obama and Biden before their inauguration, but said "not true" when Obama lied about the Citizens United decision during the SOTUA.
Is there a source for this to looked at???
Sorry for my ignorance, I’ve not been on F.R. regularly, but what is Mal-Valer???
And Thomas never said: “We are evading that”???
One observation is not a proof. It just seemed rather strange their expressions were not troubled. I remember suppressed fear on the faces from the Hudson Miracle.
Let me see if I can help you out with your English, which is only my 3rd. language, sorry. I could done it more correctly in my native language, but that wouldn’t have helped you either, so here we go:
1) Did President Reagan make any “funny” = controversial decisions after meeting with member of SCOTUS, and was this meeting disclosed in some details, publicly?
2) Did President Clinton make any “funny” = controversial decisions after meeting with members of SCOTUS and was this meeting disclosed in some details, publicly??
3) I’m sorry I’ve confused you, I tried to make it shorter for you to understand, which you obviously do NO!!!!
Interesting take, did both of them NOT also voted against Barry, (Soebarkah,) Soetoro, AKA BOH???
An interesting thread.
Much valid info amidst other...stuff.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/backroom/2913366/posts?page=1790#1790
It would help if you could state what “funny” = controversial decision(s) Obama made after meeting with 8 of the 9 members of SCOTUS. We all know that Obama’s meeting was disclosed publicly as there are pictures of the meeting. It was Chief Justice Roberts who invited Obama & Biden.
Obama and Biden meet with Supreme Court justices
Los Angeles Times
January 15, 2009
The pre-inaugural visit has become something of a tradition among incoming presidents. It also gave Obama and Chief Justice John Roberts a fresh start; Obama voted against his confirmation in 2005.
WASHINGTON — President-elect Barack Obama paid a visit Wednesday to the Supreme Court and chatted in front of a fireplace with Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., a fellow Harvard law graduate whose confirmation he opposed three years ago.
The two will meet again at noon Tuesday, when the chief justice gives the oath of the office to the incoming president.
Wednesday’s meeting was described as a relaxed, get-acquainted session. It included Roberts, seven associate justices and Vice President-elect Joe Biden.
The absence of Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr., who was at the court Wednesday morning for arguments in two cases, was a mystery. He has, however, voiced lingering anger over Senate Democrats, including Obama and Biden, who voted against his confirmation three years ago. When walking on Capitol Hill, Alito has said, he crosses to the far side of the street whenever he nears the Senate Office Building.
Twice in recent decades, incoming presidents have paid a pre-inaugural visit to the court. President Reagan and Vice President George H.W. Bush did so in 1981, and President Clinton and Vice President Al Gore in 1992. Clinton was an hour late and kept then-Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist waiting.
Obama, however, was on time for his 3:45 p.m. meeting.
No such visit was arranged for President Bush in 2001. Since the Supreme Court had cleared the way for Bush’s victory a few weeks earlier in a 5-4 ruling, a friendly visit was seen as awkward.
Last month Roberts wrote Obama and extended an invitation. Noting the past visits, he said, “The associate justices and I would be pleased to see that sporadic practice become a congenial tradition.”
When Roberts was seeking confirmation in September 2005, he met privately with Obama, who was then the junior senator from Illinois.
The next day, Obama voted against his confirmation, though he said he did so reluctantly.
http://articles.latimes.com/2009/jan/15/nation/na-obama-roberts15
You quote a comment made in 2008? Hasn’t any water flown under your bridge since then? Apparently not, and there’s the root of your problem. You’re in a time warp. You’re forever stuck in Mary-baby-sat-the-potus land. Before she dropped the can, that the woman who Charlette Le Fevre found in Seattle was ANNA OBAMA whose child Mary babysat in January 1961, while Stanley Ann Dunham was still in high school when that child was conceived.
http://www.conservativecrusader.com/articles/b-hussein-obama-i-will-stand-with-the-muslims
Page 261 in Audacity of Hope
After which I traced the image to a porn site that devoted several pages to images of girls wearing stockings, high heeled shoes and large earrings. The images published by someone claiming they were of Stanley Ann, one with a serial number, had been removed, but there were a number of others of the same girl.
I finally traced the original poster. It turned out to be a Brisbane 'academic' who claimed they had been sent to him by an anonymous 'genealogist' - and when I sent him further examples of the same girl, other than those he had linked to a page off-site from his blog, from which the images we are familiar with were circulated, he stopped responding to my correspondence. I didn't name him, and hoped he would be ashamed.
We then looked deeper into the comparisons between the two women, Stanley Ann and the model, and ultimately found that not only was there little resemblance, but Stanley Ann would have needed major facial restructuring to remotely resemble the model from the exotic website. Finally, a collection of the magazines in which the images appeared came to light which showed that the photographs had been published in 1958.
The site, vintage-pron com was totally wiped clean at the time of the Gilbert mockumentary. I posted literally hundreds of examples to show it was NOT the same person. And now you choose a comment I made in 2008 before all this work? Where have you been for the last five or six years?
Writing fantasy?
https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2014/02/24/jtrig-manipulation/
http://www.bigstory.ap.org/article/us-secretly-built-cuban-twitter-stir-unrest
Some links for you related to government propaganda.
At this point, anyone reading these threads wanting valid and useful info knows exactly what’s going on.
Like this woman?
Crash survivor Keith Yamamoto was holding Loretta Fuddy’s hand in the ocean in an attempt to “calm her down” (his words). It didn’t work, she died of Cardiac Arrhythmia. The stress of falling out of the sky and into the Pacific Ocean can do that to you.
When human beings are traumatized, they often are zombie-like in outward appearance, the panic is internal.
Does Richard Ndesandjo exist?
Did Buddy Richardson exist?
What about Kiasa M’Bute..
She.. so often mocked by being called Miss “Kissa-my-booty”...
Because she is now in charge of Whitehouse Kitchen Procurement.
That’s right.. you have allowed “Kissa-my-booty” to feed the President.
A Mal-Valer is a person who says Obama’s parents are Malcolm X and Valerie Sarruf. There is no source because there is zero evidence. It’s just a theory that some aggressively promote.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.