You quote a comment made in 2008? Hasn’t any water flown under your bridge since then? Apparently not, and there’s the root of your problem. You’re in a time warp. You’re forever stuck in Mary-baby-sat-the-potus land. Before she dropped the can, that the woman who Charlette Le Fevre found in Seattle was ANNA OBAMA whose child Mary babysat in January 1961, while Stanley Ann Dunham was still in high school when that child was conceived.
My point is that you claim to be able to look at an online photo and positively ID it. Specifically, you claim to be able to look at a picture of David Ndesandjo and positively ID it as Obama, current occupant of the Oval office.
Yet look at all your failures. You looked at the body of a reasonably fit, very much alive man and IDed an obese, dead Fuddy. You looked at a photo of a very much alive male, Puentes, and IDed a dead female. You looked at the photo of a woman nudie model and IDed Stanley Ann Dunham.
That is my point, and it is one-hundred percent true. So for a person whose theory depends on your one-hundred percent accurate ID of an old black and white photo of David Ndesandjo, you don’t have a leg to stand on.