Are you taking into account the distances between the cameras, the casket, the plaques, the flowers and the window mullions? The angles would be very shallow.
Here is the "genuine" image that gives you some ideas of the distances. Note the location of the easel for the Legislators' memoriam and the flowers.
Also see the location of her hands compared to the top of the casket (well below the top of the lid). Why would they Photoshop the entire image when they only need to Photoshop the casket opening?
As the family gathered around the casket, you can still see her hands and notice the plague with the lei has been moved. And the distance between the two cameras.
you can also see her hands in the earlier footage.
Nobody has a face in those photos. Now I understand why it seems like a different building; these photos have been blurred so it seems like a room with no overhead lighting, in the middle of the afternoon. Like it’s a non-lighted barn rather than a Co-Cathedral. The lighting appears to be totally different because all the colors are dulled and the clarity greatly reduced. Look at the faces, look at the shirts, look at the arms. It really looks like these images have had blurs placed over the original image. If this is news footage it was either taken with the world’s crappiest camera as opposed to the other photos taken, or else it was taken with a good camera but deliberately blurred afterwards.
If it was a focusing issue there should be SOMETHING in the image that is clear, and the other things are just out of focus, but I don’t see anything that is crisp in these images. We can see enough detail to know the shape of the signatures on the plaque but can’t make out the heavy lady’s hand, or the elbow of the woman right beside her.
These images are screwy.